All, Our meeting on Tuesday, May 10 will not include any special topics but will start with Status in the development partners spreadsheet (items in purple) and then focus the remainder of time with o

Development Partners, I want to raise your awareness to an SOW which has been written to describe work that's already underway by CAS in support of the Fast Track Ztso extension. The SOW is here: http

Hi, Philipp, a couple meetings ago we took an action item for you to provide more of a write-up on this issue. I believe it has something to do with ensuring we (RISC-V) show clear extension status on

Hi Jeff, Following are the updates on arch compatibility tests done by IITM Bitmanip & Crypto scalar Got a review comment that there is a mismatch in hex value and the corresponding integer value ment

Per today's meeting, I wanted to share the link again (in hopefully easier way) to the development partners spreadsheet. I've also added it to the Development Partners Groups.IO group page: https://li

All, Our next meeting will be next Tuesday, April 26. This meeting will feature one special topic: Show/discuss ISA/Non-ISA Dashboards for current work (Jeff) Per usual, we will be discussing status o

All, Our next meeting will be tomorrow, Tuesday, March 29. This meeting will feature one special topic: A review of the new Acceptance Criteria Status Checklists, formerly Definition of Done Checklist

Hi Jeff, Following are the updates on arch compatibility tests done by IITM Bitmanip & Crypto scalar Merge to riscv-arch-test is to be done RV64F & RV32D, Zfh, Zfinx Changes to script to test for diff

Hi Jeff and team, IITM has set up a dedicated regression test server for the entire ACT repository. The main intent behind this is to ensure that we are able to run the random regressions of the compl

In our last two meetings we've mentioned that Lyle's work with Zcee is ramping down. That leads to needing the next set of items for consideration. Here's a starter list: ACT work for Zcee. Would be a

All, Our next meeting will be on Tuesday, March 29. This meeting will feature 2 new items: A review of the new email lists for patch review (Christoph) A brief discussion on the Ztso SOW (discussion)

Thanks to Christoph for pulling together today's discussion on the new mailing lists for patch reviews within the RISC-V community. Here are his links: Prez link Wiki link Remember, this is the key re

Hi Jeff, Following are the updates on arch compatibility tests done by IITM Bitmanip Resolved all merge conflicts in riscv-arch-test FInal merge to riscv-arch-test is to be done Crypto scalar Raised P

All, Per our meeting yesterday, let's use this discussion thread to brainstorm and then organize this topic on our mailing list. For starters, I'd propose 2 categories of ideas: What resources (URLs t

Hi, Allen, In today's DevPartners meeting, your review of the Bitmanip test was requested by Anand. Would you kindly take a look at these and work with him on any remaining work? Thanks, -Jeff --Jeff

All, Our next meeting will be on Tuesday, March 15. Besides an updates on our active items in our development partners spreadsheet (items in purple), I plan to discuss the Debug SOWs (discussion). Add

Hi Jeff, Following are the updates on arch compatibility tests done by IITM Bitmanip All review comments were addressed. Merge to riscv-ctg and riscv-isac completed. Final merge to riscv-arch-test is

Hello, Development Partners, Tim Newsome, Chair of the Debug TG, has completed 3 SOWs for work in the ISA side of the Debug Package. They are: GDB enablement in Linux (SOW) ACT work for native trigger

All, Our next meeting of 2022 will be on Tuesday, March 1. We will continue to look for updates on our active items in our development partners spreadsheet (items in purple). Additionally, we will dis

Hi Jeff, Following are the updates on arch compatibility tests done by IITM Bitmanip Addressed all comments by Allen on dataset for tests. Running coverage again, will be updating PR today. Target to