Re: Fast-track extension proposal for "Sv32 Svnapot and Svpbmt"


Phil McCoy
 

Minor wording quibble - the following text sounds very tentative and hypothetical:

"Sv32 implementations could support Svnapot..."

I would suggest a more assertive wording; maybe something like the following:

"The Sv32 Svnapot and Svpbmt extension adds Svnapot and Svpbmt support to Sv32 implementations by reducing the physical address space from 34-bit to 31-bit..."

Cheers,
Phil

Join tech-privileged@lists.riscv.org to automatically receive all group messages.