On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 2:39 AM Phil McCoy <pnm@...> wrote:
Minor wording quibble - the following text sounds very tentative and hypothetical:
"Sv32 implementations could support Svnapot..."
I would suggest a more assertive wording; maybe something like the following:
"The Sv32 Svnapot and Svpbmt extension adds Svnapot and Svpbmt support to Sv32 implementations by reducing the physical address space from 34-bit to 31-bit..."
