Re: [RISC-V] [tech-virt-mem] Help needed on physical address issues
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
My understanding is that the physical address size is implementation dependent.
Iif any bit above that is set, it should report an access fault.
The ACTs don't specifically test for that now, but they will (where the implementer defines the size in its riscv-config YAML file.
It should also be defined in the config-struct encoding at some point.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 8:05 PM Ke Chai <ck.rickytino@...> wrote:
Thanks Scott, Allen and Ved for your clarification!