Re: rv(64) address space size


thank you for your comment

1.  for  now, i am only proposing  the addition of the ARM extensions to  sv57. the reason being that current linux, for ARM,  can function with this extension

2. for sv64,  i would propose a more thorough,  both analysis and extension, for security.  it is unclear to me how this would function within the riscv privileged working group.

3. i am NOT  adverse to adding other security extensions to sv57.  i just want to make sure the ARM extension is specified

i  hope this clarifies my views


I'm trying to understand from your comments what ISA-related changes do you propose for Sv57/Sv64 other than the address space extension, the only comment I got is the TTBR0/1 split on ARM/ARM64. Also I don't see why Sv57/Sv64 should be treated differently security-wise, could you please clarify ?

WARNING / LEGAL TEXT: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential, proprietary, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying, or in any way using this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and destroy and delete any copies you may have received.

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.