Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements


atishp@...
 

On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 22:20 +0530, Mayuresh Chitale wrote:
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server
extension

Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...>
---
 riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 174
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.adoc
index 4418788..e738585 100644
--- a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc
+++ b/riscv-platform-spec.adoc
@@ -47,7 +47,21 @@ include::profiles.adoc[]
 |RVA22     | RISC-V Application 2022
 |EE        | Execution Environment
 |RV32GC    | RISC-V 32-bit general purpose ISA described as
RV32IMAFDC.
-|RV64GC    | RISC-V 64-bit general purpose ISA described as
RV64IMAFDC.     
+|RV64GC    | RISC-V 64-bit general purpose ISA described as
RV64IMAFDC.
+|PCIe      | PCI Express
+|ECAM      | Enhanced Configuration Access Mechanism
+|BAR       | Base Address Register
+|AER       | Advanced Error Reporting
+|CRS       | Configuration Request Retry Status
+|TLP       | Transaction Layer Packet
+|RCiEP     | Root Complex Integrated Endpoint
+|RCEC      | Root Complex Event Collector
+|PME       | Power Management Event
+|MSI       | Message Signaled Interrupts
+|MSI-X     | Enhanced Message Signaled Interrupts
+|INTx      | PCIe Legacy Interrupts
+|PMA       | Physical Memory Attributes
+|PBMT      | Page Based Memory Types
 |===
 
 === Specifications
@@ -363,7 +377,163 @@
https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-privileged/message/404[Sstc] extension
.
 ** Platforms are required to delegate the supervisor timer interrupt
to 'S'
 mode. If the 'H' extension is implemented then the platforms are
required to
 delegate the virtual supervisor timer interrupt to 'VS' mode.
-* PCI-E
+
+===== PCIe
+Platforms are required to support at least PCIe Base Specification
Revision 1.1
+footnote:[https://pcisig.com/specifications].
+
+====== PCIe Config Space
+* Platforms shall support access to the PCIe config space via ECAM
as described
+in the PCIe Base specification.
+* The entire config space for a single PCIe domain should be
accessible via a
+single ECAM I/O region.
+* Platform firmware should implement the MCFG table to allow the
operating
MCFG table was not referenced earlier.

+systems to discover the supported PCIe domains and map the ECAM I/O
region for
+each domain.
+* Platform software shall configure ECAM I/O regions such that the
effective
+memory type (PMA + PBMT) is UC.
+
UC is not present in abbreviation section. Moreover, PMA + PBMT seems
bit ambiguous to me. It wouldn't hurt to be more verbose here.

+====== PCIe Memory Space
+Platforms are required to map PCIe address space directly in the
system address
+space and not have any address translation for outbound accesses
from harts or
+for inbound accesses to any component in the system address space
+
+* PCIe Outbound Memory +
+PCIe devices and bridges/switches frequently implement BARs which
only support
+32-bit addressing or support 64 bit addressing but do not support
prefetchable
+memory. To support mapping of such BARs, platforms are required to
reserve
+some space below 4G for each root port present in the system.
+
+[sidebar]
+--
+[underline]*_Implementation Note_* +
+Platform software would likely configure these per root port regions
such that
+their effective memory type (PMA + PBMT) is UC. 
same comment as above.

Platforms would likely also
+reserve some space above 4G to map BARs that support 64 bit
addressing and
+prefetchable memory which could be configured by the platform
software as either
+I/O or memory.
+--
+
+* PCIe Inbound Memory +
+For security reasons, platforms must provide a mechanism controlled
by M-mode
+software to restrict inbound PCIe accesses from accessing regions of
address
+space intended to be accessible only to M-mode software.
+
+[sidebar]
+--
+[underline]*_Implementation Note_* +
+Such an access control mechanism could be analogous to the per-hart
PMP
+as described in the RISC-V Privileged Architectures specification.
+--
+
+====== PCIe Interrupts
+* Platforms shall support both INTx and MSI/MSI-x interrupts.
+* Integration with AIA +
+TBD
+
+====== PCIe cache coherency
+PCIe transactions that are not marked as No_snoop and access memory
that is
/s/No_snoop/No Snoop ?

+cacheable by harts, as well as accesses to memory that is
noncacheable by
+harts, are I/O Coherent and no software coherency management is
needed.
+In contrast, PCIe transactions that are marked as No_snoop and
access memory
+that is cacheable by harts, must have coherency managed by software.
+
+====== PCIe Topology
+Platforms are required to implement at least one of the following
topologies
+and the components required in that topology.
+
+[ditaa]
+....
+
+            +----------+                             +----------+
+            |   CPU    |                             |   CPU    |
+            |          |                             |          |
+            +-----|----+                             +-----|----+
+                  |                                        |
+                  |                                        |
+    +-------------|------------+             +-------------|--------
----+
+    |        ROOT | COMPLEX    |             |        ROOT |
COMPLEX    |
+    |                          |            
|                          |
+    |      +------|-------+    |             |      +------|-------
+    |
+    |      |  Host Bridge |    |             |      |  Host Bridge
|    |
+    |      +------|-------+    |             |      +------|-------
+    |
+    |             |            |             |            
|            |
+    |             | BUS 0      |             |             | BUS
0      |
+    |     |-------|------|     |             |       +-----|-------
+    |
+    |     |              |     |             |       | ROOT  PORT 
|    |
+    |     |              |     |             |       +-----|-------
+    |
+    | +---|---+      +---|---+ |             |            
|            |
+    | | RCiEP |      | RCEC  | |             |             | PCIe
Link  |
+    | +-------+      +-------+ |             |            
|            |
+    |                          |             +-------------|--------
----+
+    +--------------------------+                           |
+                                                           |  BUS 1
+    RCiEP - Root complex integrated endpoint
+    RCEC - Root complex event collector
+....
+
+* Host Bridge +
+Following are the requirements for host bridges:
+
+** Any read or write access by a hart to an ECAM I/O region shall be
converted
+by the host bridge into the corresponding PCIe config read or config
write
+request.
+** Any read or write access by a hart to a PCIe outbound region
shall be
+forwarded by the host bridge to a BAR or prefetch/non-prefetch
memory window,
+if the address falls within the region claimed by the BAR or
prefetch/
+non-prefetch memory window. Otherwise the host bridge shall return
an error.
+
+** Host bridge shall return all 1s in the following cases:
+*** Config read to non existent functions and devices on root bus.
+*** Config reads that receive Unsupported Request response from
functions and
+devices on the root bus.
+* Root ports +
+Following are the requirements for root ports.
+** Root ports shall appear as PCI-PCI bridge to software.
+** Root ports shall implement all registers of Type 1 header.
+** Root ports shall implement all capabilities specified in the PCIe
Base
+specification for a root port.
+** Root ports shall forward type 1 configuration access when the bus
number in
+the TLP is greater than the root port's secondary bus number and
less than or
+equal to the root port's subordinate bus number.
+** Root ports shall convert type 1 configuration access to a type 0
+configuration access when bus number in the TLP is equal to the root
port's
+secondary bus number.
+** Root ports shall respond to any type 0 configuration accesses it
receives.
+** Root ports shall forward memory accesses targeting its
prefetch/non-prefetch
+memory windows to downstream components. If address of the
transaction does not
+fall within the regions claimed by prefetch/non-prefetch memory
windows then
+the root port shall generate a Unsupported Request.
+** Root port requester id or completer id shall be formed using the
bdf of the
+root port.
+** The root ports shall support the CRS software visibility.
+** The root port shall implement the AER capability.
+** Root ports shall return all 1s in the following cases:
+*** Config read to non existent functions and devices on secondary
bus.
+*** Config reads that receive Unsupported Request from downstream
components.
+*** Config read when root port's link is down.
+
+* RCiEP +
+All the requirements for RCiEP in the PCIe Base specification shall
be
+implemented.
+In addition the following requirements shall be met:
+** If RCiEP is implemented then RCEC shall be implemented as well.
All
+requirements for RCEC specified in the PCIe Base specification shall
be
+implemented. RCEC is required to terminate the AER and PME messages
from RCiEP.
+** If both the topologies mentioned above are supported then RCiEP
and RCEC
+shall be implemented in a separate PCIe domain and shall be
addressable via a
+separate ECAM I/O region.
+
+===== PCIe Device Firmware Requirement
+PCI expansion ROM code type 3 (UEFI) image must be provided by PCIe
device for
+OS/A server extension platform according to
+https://pcisig.com/specifications/conventional/pci_firmware[PCI Firm
ware Specification Revision 3.3]
+if that PCIe device is utilized during UEFI firmware boot process.
The image
+stored in PCI expansion ROM is an UEFI driver that must be compliant
with
+https://uefi.org/specifications[UEFI specification 2.9] 14.4.2 PCI
Option ROMs.
+
+====== PCIe peer to peer transactions +
+TBD
 
 ==== Secure Boot
 * TEE
Apart from the above nit comments, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>

--
Regards,
Atish

Join tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org to automatically receive all group messages.