Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension
Josh Scheid
Can the *tinst wording correspond more directly to priv Table 5.9. Is the intent the following, or something more relaxed? - "Yes" in the "Transformed Standard Instruction" means that that content must be written to *tinst for that exception - "No" in the
"Transformed Standard Instruction" means that zero must be written to *tinst for that exception -Josh On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 7:35 AM Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> wrote:
|
|