Re: Public review of Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI) Specification
Andrew Waterman
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:48 PM Anup Patel <apatel@...> wrote: HI Andrew, It's true that specific example is limited to those calls, but I'll re-emphase the "e.g." The RV32 variants have not gotten much road testing because there isn't much demand for them--which again calls into question why we are rushing to ratify them. So, I'll re-emphasize our suggestion that we only ratify the RV64 versions.
Cool, thanks!
|
|