Re: [RISC-V][privileged-software] [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unprivileged] Direction of Identifying Extensions
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...>
Duplicating the information (i.e. having the individual extensions marked and the profile itself indicated) seems like an error-prone proposal, unless we mandate/enforce consistency checking. Given that this does not provide a significant benefit, it seems safer to stick with the canonical form listing the base and individual extensions. What is the expected benefit from duplicating this information? Philipp.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 23:15, Allen Baum <allen.baum@...> wrote:
|
|