Re: [RISC-V] [tech-aia] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
Aaron Durbin
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 8:17 AM Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> wrote: Hi All, I don't think we should submit this one until we settle on how we convey behaviors outside of an ISA string. I suspect that will change so we should anticipate that. Right now we have ISA string plus CMO parameters as specific RHCT Nodes. Are we concerned about timing on adoption to push this in its current form? I ask because I'd rather not have this set in stone only for us to quickly come back and say "stop using these fields. we have a new node/mechanism to convey this information". What do you think? I brought up this topic in the TSC meeting this week as I indicated I would. I need to work with some others to formalize the direction, but that's going to take a little more time.
Aside from maybe wordsmithing a little more for clarity purposes (based on commentary) I think this one seems fine from my standpoint.
|
|