tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

Greg, The patch has already been merged. Can you please keep track of the movement of this text to elsewhere? Regards Kumar

By Kumar Sankaran · #1177 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

Meaning let the patch go forward since I'll be keeping track of this movement of text to elsewhere? Greg

By Greg Favor · #1176 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

Yeah, that’s fine by me, too.

By andrew@... · #1175 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

Once the RVA22 profile spec is finalized and turned into a spec document, then that is what the platform spec will (and can for now) refer to. In the meantime, it is still in process of being created

By Greg Favor · #1174 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

I thought it is already decided that it will be part of the RVA22 profile spec. It seems that it is not yet added to the RVA22 profile spec. Is there a draft version of the RVA22 profile spec that we

By atishp@... · #1173 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

Please do not remove these until they have been added to the appropriate place. They need to be written somewhere, and I am worried about them getting lost (or, worse, pointlessly argued over again

By andrew@... · #1172 ·

[PATCH v5 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1171 ·

[PATCH v5 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe

V5: - Improve text for PCIe cache coherency requirement. V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1170 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

Thanks Atish. Actually one more revision is required for this patch. During an internal review, a modification was suggested to me for the PCIe cache coherency requirement text. I will do that and

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1169 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> -- Regards, Atish

By atishp@... · #1168 ·

[PATCH v2 3/3] Add PMU section

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc

By atishp@... · #1167 ·

[PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must

By atishp@... · #1166 ·

[PATCH v2 1/3] Remove old & redundant sections.

The platform and profile specification mean different things now. All the points specified in supervisor.adoc are already described in the new revamped platform spec. Remove these old

By atishp@... · #1165 ·

[PATCH v4 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1164 ·

[PATCH v4 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe

V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer transactions V3: - Replaced references to PMA+PBMT by PMA - Moved the

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1163 ·

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

Yes, I think this is reasonable.

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1162 ·

[PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: ACPI for OS-A Base Spec

ACPI Requirement for OS-A Base Discovery mechanism. This requirement adds ACPI as an choice for discovery mechanism which firmware can implement. In case the firmware supports both Devicetree and

By Rahul Pathak · #1161 ·

Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jul 12th 2021 8AM PST

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon July 12th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github

By Kumar Sankaran · #1160 ·

[PATCH 3/3] Add PMU section

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc

By atishp@... · #1159 ·

[PATCH 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc

The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must

By atishp@... · #1158 ·

681 - 700 of 1857

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms