Hi Abner, Do we need both words - non-local and global ? Should we just say implementation specific? The last sentence is not clear to me. Could you rephrase it? I think you also need to add

Hi Heinrich, Abner, I did respond to Heinrich https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-unixplatformspec/message/832 I didn't want to specify "Load from ramdisk" since it can restrict the usage. I think the

Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@...> 於 2021年5月5日 週三 下午12:48寫道： Hmm, seems you are correct. AIA says it would expand the framework to local interrupts but RISC-V timer and

Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@...> 於 2021年5月5日 週三 下午2:23寫道： Dear Heinrich, I made the mistake to send this patch before I changing to my local branch for the patch of

Dear Abner, https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-unixplatformspec/message/831?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,efi_load_file2_protocol,20,2,0,82475933 mentioned use cases for the

For the base spec, requirements need to be agnostic of particular implementation. Since EBBR does not talks about PI and if any new implementation complies with EBBR it may or may not have PI

Is the CLINT also deprecated? From what I can tell in the AIA spec it doesn't include a replacement for the CLINT. What should be used for mtime/mtimecmp instead? Alistair

From: Abner Chang <renba.chang@...> Initial description of PLIC + CLINT section of Linux-2022 platform. In this commit, - Not sure where to put the [DEPRECATED]. - Change the reference of PLIC

From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> This specifies mandatory requirements for server class platforms in addition to the requirements in base specification. Many dependencies and granular

Is the counter required to be at least 10ns resolution or exactly 10ns resolution? The document seems to be inconsistent on which is desired, but I personally don't see the point of having an "at

Base spec: - UART - Clock and Timers Server extension: - Clock and Timers Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 137

Adding myself to list of contributors. Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- contributors.adoc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

This patch describes requirements for the system peripherals like UART, clock and timers for the Linux-2022 platform base spec and the server extension. Changes in V2: Rephrased the requirements to

We are using the term "embedded platform" for RTOS systems. These don't use UEFI at all. Do you mean "Linux Platform"? U-Boot only implements the EBBR subset of the UEFI spec. U-Boot does not target

Hi Rahul, my responses in below. Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...> 於 2021年5月3日 週一 下午9:55寫道： EBBR is defined for the embedded platform with the minimum requirements of UEFI to boot to

Hi Abner, I read the UEFI PI Vol2 section. Need to understand if EBBR requirements on the format are not sufficient to achieve the minimum requirements for compliance. Also what those UEFI Protocols

Reviewed-by: Abner Chang <renba.chang@...> Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> 於 2021年5月3日 週一 下午5:50寫道：

This specifies mandatory requirements for server class platforms in addition to the requirements in base specification. Many dependencies and granular details are still TBD. But this is a good

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- contributors.adoc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/contributors.adoc b/contributors.adoc index

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...> --- changelog.adoc | 2 +-