tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] Update terminology and specification tables

Currently, there is no released version of the PLIC spec. We should add that to a TODO list before the platform spec goes out for a public review. It should be "v2.0.1" Not sure if we should refer

By atishp@... · #1257 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension

If writing non-zero values to mtval and stval are going to be required by OS/A-base, then I think it should require non-zero values for mtinst and htinst. The transformed instruction encodings for

By Jonathan Behrens <behrensj@...> · #1256 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] Move terminology and specifications tables to correct location

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> -- Regards, Atish

By atishp@... · #1255 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] Follow profile naming as-per latest RISC-V profiles spec

Here are more details on profile naming convention https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/master/profiles.adoc However, the current draft profile spec doesn't event mention about these terms

By atishp@... · #1254 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] Minor cosmetic changes in SBI section of OS/A-base platform

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> -- Regards, Atish

By atishp@... · #1253 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] Re-write the interrupts and timer section

These categories can be subsections instead of just bullets. Just to align with other options: "Legacy wired IRQs" will be better /s/legacy/existing ? Most of the platform released in next couple

By atishp@... · #1252 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension

Can the *tinst wording correspond more directly to priv Table 5.9. Is the intent the following, or something more relaxed? - "Yes" in the "Transformed Standard Instruction" means that that content

By Josh Scheid · #1251 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension

Hi Jonathan, Current approach is to mandate mtinst and htinst only for OS-A Server. If more people agree then we can mandate mtinst and htinst for OS-A Base. Regards, Anup From: Jonathan

By Anup Patel · #1250 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Alistair

By Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> · #1249 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] Follow profile naming as-per latest RISC-V profiles spec

Why do these have 64 at the end? Alistair

By Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> · #1248 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] Minor cosmetic changes in SBI section of OS/A-base platform

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Alistair

By Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> · #1247 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] Move terminology and specifications tables to correct location

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Alistair

By Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> · #1246 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] Update terminology and specification tables

Hi Peter, I think the links are malformed if we directly click from this email because these links are in asciidoc syntax. The link syntax for asciidoc is: link:<url>[<display_text>]

By Anup Patel · #1245 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] Update terminology and specification tables

Greg and Anup, I think the links are mostly just malformed. For example, the first one was presumably meant to go to https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_9_2021_03_18.pdf and

By Peter Glaskowsky · #1244 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension

The H-extension adds a mtinst and htinst registers. If we're requiring non-zero values in mtval and stval, shouldn't those have similar requirements?

By Jonathan Behrens <behrensj@...> · #1243 ·

[RESEND PATCH] Move ACPI requirements to separate document.

The platform spec will refer to this ACPI requirements document similar to other specifications like SBI etc. Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 76

By Sunil V L · #1242 ·

[PATCH] Move ACPI requirements to separate document and provide the link to it from the main platform spec.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 76 +++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) diff --git

By Sunil V L · #1241 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension

On 07/08/21, 12:56 PM, "Heinrich Schuchardt" <xypron.glpk@...> wrote: The phrase "Platforms are allowed to operate only in little-endian mode" literally means that * some

By Anup Patel · #1240 ·

[PATCH V3] * riscv-platform-spec: Real-time Clock to server extension

From: Abner Chang <abner.chang@...> In V3: - Change System Real-time to System Date/Time - Make this paragraph shorter. In V2: Change the section to System Real-time and rephrase

By Abner Chang · #1239 ·

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] Update terminology and specification tables

If possible, it would seem to be better for the coming several months to have links go to the github pages from which one can then find the PDF and/or adoc of the latest draft of the document. Then

By Greg Favor · #1238 ·

601 - 620 of 1857

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms