We don't need a table for required SBI extensions and UEFI interfaces is implemented by UEFI firmware. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 47

We re-write the interrupts and timer section to align the interrupts and timer table. We also add more fine grained requirements for AIA. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> --- Makefile

The terminology table should be at start and specification table should be at the end. Also, specification table should be replaced with bibliography reference list. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel

This patch updates terminology and specification table in following ways: 1) Provide complete expansion of terms for APLIC and ACLINT 2) Add links to unprivileged and privileged specifications 3) Add

To have a meaningful H-extension support, both OS/A-base and OS/A-server platforms must comply with additional requirements for H-extension. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> ---

Reviewed-by: Abner Chang <abner.chang@...> Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> 於 2021年7月28日 週三 下午9:34寫道：

We don't need a table for required SBI extensions and UEFI interfaces is implemented by UEFI firmware. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 45

We re-write the interrupts and timer section to align the interrupts and timer table. We also add more fine grained requirements for AIA. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> --- Makefile

This patch updates terminology and specification table in following ways: 1) Provide complete expansion of terms for APLIC and ACLINT 2) Add links to unprivileged and privileged specifications 3) Add

To have a meaningful H-extension support, both OS/A-base and OS/A-server platforms must comply with additional requirements for H-extension. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> ---

Please see inline below... Regards, Anup On 29/07/21, 12:21 AM, "Heinrich Schuchardt" <xypron.glpk@...> wrote: Content-wise I am happy. I would just change the wording and a bit:

Please see inline below ... Regards, Anup On 29/07/21, 12:04 AM, "Heinrich Schuchardt" <xypron.glpk@...> wrote: %s/for OS-A/for the OS-A/ [Anup] Okay, will update. Do you want to

Please see inline below .... Regards, Anup On 28/07/21, 11:30 PM, "Heinrich Schuchardt" <xypron.glpk@...> wrote: Just a few typos %s/If H-extension/If the H-extension/

Content-wise I am happy. I would just change the wording and a bit: The M-mode runtime must implement SBI specification version 0.3 or higher. %s/includes/include/ %s/responsibilities/features/

%s/for OS-A/for the OS-A/ Do you want to allow harts with further ACLINT MTIMER devices? Or is the requirement that each hart must have exactly one ACLINT MTIMER device? An example would help: If

Just a few typos %s/If H-extension/If the H-extension/ %s/with/with the/ %s/pyscial/physical/ ditto Best regards Heinrich

Hello everyone, This is a proposal to add Coffer Trusted Execution Environment(TEE) as a new member of SBI Implementations List. Coffer is a TEE implemented for RISC-V 32/64 systems. It utilizes the

We don't need a table for required SBI extensions and UEFI interfaces is implemented by UEFI firmware. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33

We re-write the interrupts and timer section to align the interrupts and timer table. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...> --- Makefile | 4 +- riscv-platform-spec.adoc |

This patch updates specification table in following ways: 1) Provide complete expansion of terms for APLIC and ACLINT 2) Add links to unprivileged and privileged specifications 3) Add link to legacy