Greg, The patch has already been merged. Can you please keep track of the movement of this text to elsewhere? Regards Kumar

Meaning let the patch go forward since I'll be keeping track of this movement of text to elsewhere? Greg

Yeah, that’s fine by me, too.

Once the RVA22 profile spec is finalized and turned into a spec document, then that is what the platform spec will (and can for now) refer to. In the meantime, it is still in process of being created

I thought it is already decided that it will be part of the RVA22 profile spec. It seems that it is not yet added to the RVA22 profile spec. Is there a draft version of the RVA22 profile spec that we

Please do not remove these until they have been added to the appropriate place. They need to be written somewhere, and I am worried about them getting lost (or, worse, pointlessly argued over again

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa

V5: - Improve text for PCIe cache coherency requirement. V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer

Thanks Atish. Actually one more revision is required for this patch. During an internal review, a modification was suggested to me for the PCIe cache coherency requirement text. I will do that and

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> -- Regards, Atish

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc

The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must

The platform and profile specification mean different things now. All the points specified in supervisor.adoc are already described in the new revamped platform spec. Remove these old

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa

V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer transactions V3: - Replaced references to PMA+PBMT by PMA - Moved the

Yes, I think this is reasonable.

ACPI Requirement for OS-A Base Discovery mechanism. This requirement adds ACPI as an choice for discovery mechanism which firmware can implement. In case the firmware supports both Devicetree and

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon July 12th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc

The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must