tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

MCFG table was not referenced earlier. UC is not present in abbreviation section. Moreover, PMA + PBMT seems bit ambiguous to me. It wouldn't hurt to be more verbose here. same comment as

By atishp@... · #1137 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

Looks good.Reviewed-by: Abner Chang <abner.chang@...> Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> 於 2021年7月2日週五上午12:50寫道：

By Abner Chang · #1136 ·

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Initial commit of PLIC

I think it will be good to provide additional clarification in the beginning about the number of interrupts/contexts. Something along the lines: The PLIC specification supports up-to 1024 interrupts

By atishp@... · #1135 ·

Re: [PATCH v2] Cache Coherency and ASID Requirements for OS-A platform

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> -- Regards, Atish

By atishp@... · #1134 ·

[PATCH v2 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 174

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1133 ·

[PATCH v2 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe

V2: - Fixed abbreviation for root complex integrated endpoint - Added section for PCIe device firmware requirement. V1: - Initial patch. Mayuresh Chitale (1): server extension: PCIe requirements

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1132 ·

[PATCH v2] Cache Coherency and ASID Requirements for OS-A platform

Updated v2 of the cache coherency patch Changes from v1 Brought in all cache coherency changes after feedback Removed ASID requirements diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc

By Kumar Sankaran · #1131 ·

Re: [PATCH 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

Sure. Yes, I will fix in the next revision. Yes, looks like I missed it. I will include it in the next revision.

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1130 ·

Re: [PATCH 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> 於 2021年6月30日週三上午12:27寫道： Suggest using RCiEP (lower case of "I") which is aligned with PCIE spec. Should this be RCiEP? If yes, then the same

By Abner Chang · #1129 ·

Re: UEFI/ACPI ECR process proposal

We have the initial draft of an official RISC-V Glossary: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-glossary Anyone can can create an issue for the Glossary. We could append the Glossary to each and every

By Elisa Sawyer <elisa@...> · #1128 ·

[PATCH 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 166

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1127 ·

[PATCH 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe

This is an initial patch for PCIe requirements for the server extension. The goal is to specify requirements for those PCIe elements which interact with the system such as PCIe config space, memory

By Mayuresh Chitale · #1126 ·

Re: UEFI/ACPI ECR process proposal

do we have a glossary (with links if apropos) for the acronyms in use in the docs (like IMSIC)? more than just what the acronym is for but like what the item is for and either a standards definition

By mark · #1125 ·

UEFI/ACPI ECR process proposal

Hi Team, As we discussed in the Platform HSC meeting yesterday, I am attaching the snapshot of the slides presented. Please also go through the

By Sunil V L · #1124 ·

Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv-platform-spec: Real-time Clock to server extension

Jonathan Behrens <behrensj@...> 於 2021年6月29日週二上午2:32寫道： I don't think that is necessary to mention how to program the RTC in platform spec. We just need the RTC to keep

By Abner Chang · #1123 ·

Re: FW: [riscv/riscv-platform-specs] RVM platform requirements (#25)

Keep in mind the distinction between RVM ISA profile specs and M platform specs. I would expect that the M platform spec would require the RVM ISA profile spec. But all the individual FP and C

By Greg Favor · #1122 ·

FW: [riscv/riscv-platform-specs] RVM platform requirements (#25)

Forwarding to tech mailing list. Regards Kumar

By Kumar Sankaran · #1121 ·

Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv-platform-spec: Real-time Clock to server extension

What does "implementation specific" mean in this context? Could the platform spec require implementations to program the RTC with UTC times? If not, could it recommend/encourage them to? Jonathan

By Jonathan Behrens <behrensj@...> · #1120 ·

Re: Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jun 28 2021 8AM PST

https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/blob/main/riscv-platform-spec.adoc Yes, it includes all planned extensions. Regards Kumar

By Kumar Sankaran · #1119 ·

Re: Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jun 28 2021 8AM PST

where are the current platform specifications that are under development being stored? does it include extensions? Thanks Mark

By mark · #1118 ·

721 - 740 of 1857

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms