|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
just a reminder that we should be moving to unified discovery during boot to feed everything. not isa strings. not csrs.
--------
sent from a mobile device. please forgive any typos.
just a reminder that we should be moving to unified discovery during boot to feed everything. not isa strings. not csrs.
--------
sent from a mobile device. please forgive any typos.
|
By
mark
·
#1772
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
Hi,
I'm top posting with some notes that Furquan helped me put together to cover the things we've been talking about. We may want to put these and future notes somewhere else (drive, github, etc) so
Hi,
I'm top posting with some notes that Furquan helped me put together to cover the things we've been talking about. We may want to put these and future notes somewhere else (drive, github, etc) so
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
#1771
·
|
|
Direction of Identifying Extensions
Hi All,
First off, please redirect me where the most appropriate forum is to discuss this topic. I am casting a fairly wide net, but that's just trying to cover those who are impacted. We can convene
Hi All,
First off, please redirect me where the most appropriate forum is to discuss this topic. I am casting a fairly wide net, but that's just trying to cover those who are impacted. We can convene
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
#1770
·
|
|
Re: Review request for ACPI ECRs
Hi All,
Thanks a lot for great feedback over last week on the ECRs. I have
created version 2 of the ECRs addressing most of the comments. We will be
discussing this version of the ECRs in this week's
Hi All,
Thanks a lot for great feedback over last week on the ECRs. I have
created version 2 of the ECRs addressing most of the comments. We will be
discussing this version of the ECRs in this week's
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#1769
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V] [tech-aia] Invitation: Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2 @ Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm - 10:30pm (IST) (tech-aia@lists.riscv.org)
Sunil Hi -
July 4 is a holiday in the US. COuld we meet on 5th?
regards
ved
Sunil Hi -
July 4 is a holiday in the US. COuld we meet on 5th?
regards
ved
|
By
Ved Shanbhogue
·
#1768
·
|
|
Invitation: Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2 @ Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm - 10:30pm (IST) (tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org)
You have been invited to the following event.
Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2
When
Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata
Joining info
Join with Google
You have been invited to the following event.
Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2
When
Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata
Joining info
Join with Google
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#1767
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Review request for ACPI ECRs
In case the meeting details are not reflecting in the invite, here is
the info:
Meeting link: https://zoom.us/j/7237830759
Passcode: 741796
Join link:
In case the meeting details are not reflecting in the invite, here is
the info:
Meeting link: https://zoom.us/j/7237830759
Passcode: 741796
Join link:
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#1766
·
|
|
Re: SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
I get the intent now. But we may not want to prohibit that.
We may want to document that the SBI will access this memory using
the PMA attribute.
If the supervisor has accessed this same location
I get the intent now. But we may not want to prohibit that.
We may want to document that the SBI will access this memory using
the PMA attribute.
If the supervisor has accessed this same location
|
By
Ved Shanbhogue
·
#1765
·
|
|
Re: SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
The term "domain" is not used in the proposal since it is OpenSBI specific.
My comment was mainly for Heinrich since he is already aware of OpenSBI
domains.
In general, other M-mode firmwares might
The term "domain" is not used in the proposal since it is OpenSBI specific.
My comment was mainly for Heinrich since he is already aware of OpenSBI
domains.
In general, other M-mode firmwares might
|
By
Anup Patel
·
#1764
·
|
|
Re: SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
So domain is a new term which is not presently defined in the privileged specification or in the SBI specification.
I think I get what you may be stating here i.e., M-mode may configure/
reconfigure
So domain is a new term which is not presently defined in the privileged specification or in the SBI specification.
I think I get what you may be stating here i.e., M-mode may configure/
reconfigure
|
By
Ved Shanbhogue
·
#1763
·
|
|
Re: SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
As this is a security feature we should require:
The SBI MUST check that the full memory range is read-accessible by the caller.
Here too we should make it clear if the SBI MUST or MAY check the
As this is a security feature we should require:
The SBI MUST check that the full memory range is read-accessible by the caller.
Here too we should make it clear if the SBI MUST or MAY check the
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#1762
·
|
|
Re: SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
The term "supervisor-mode" over here means:
* HS-mode or VS-mode on systems with H-extension
* S-mode on systems without H-extension
(Please see the introduction chapter of SBI specification)
In
The term "supervisor-mode" over here means:
* HS-mode or VS-mode on systems with H-extension
* S-mode on systems without H-extension
(Please see the introduction chapter of SBI specification)
In
|
By
Anup Patel
·
#1761
·
|
|
Re: SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
Why should only S-mode and not HS-mode be allowed? I think the modes
that are allowed to access this extension should be enumerated more clearly.
How are systems treated that only have M-mode and
Why should only S-mode and not HS-mode be allowed? I think the modes
that are allowed to access this extension should be enumerated more clearly.
How are systems treated that only have M-mode and
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#1760
·
|
|
SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
Hi All,
Based on feedback, below is the updated draft proposal of the
SBI Debug Console Extension ...
The motivations behind this proposal is as follows:
1) There is no new SBI extension replacing
Hi All,
Based on feedback, below is the updated draft proposal of the
SBI Debug Console Extension ...
The motivations behind this proposal is as follows:
1) There is no new SBI extension replacing
|
By
Anup Patel
·
#1759
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Review request for ACPI ECRs
Sounds good. Thanks, Sunil!
- Furquan
Sounds good. Thanks, Sunil!
- Furquan
|
By
Furquan Shaikh
·
#1758
·
|
|
Invitation: Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting @ Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:30pm - 10:30pm (IST) (tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org)
You have been invited to the following event.
Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting
When
Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata
Joining info
Join with Google
You have been invited to the following event.
Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting
When
Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata
Joining info
Join with Google
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#1757
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Review request for ACPI ECRs
Hi Furquan,
Yes, let's do that. I will setup a meeting on Monday 27th 2022. We can
continue the discussion later if we can not finish in an hour.
Thanks!
Sunil
Hi Furquan,
Yes, let's do that. I will setup a meeting on Monday 27th 2022. We can
continue the discussion later if we can not finish in an hour.
Thanks!
Sunil
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#1756
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Review request for ACPI ECRs
Hello Sunil,
Thanks for sending out these ECRs. After looking at these documents,
we have a lot of comments/questions, but I think it might be
productive to walk through the assumptions and approach
Hello Sunil,
Thanks for sending out these ECRs. After looking at these documents,
we have a lot of comments/questions, but I think it might be
productive to walk through the assumptions and approach
|
By
Furquan Shaikh
·
#1755
·
|
|
Review request for ACPI ECRs
Hi All,
Please review below Engineering Change Request (ECR) to update the ACPI
spec for enabling basic ACPI support for RISC-V.
1) Add INTC structure in MADT Table -
Hi All,
Please review below Engineering Change Request (ECR) to update the ACPI
spec for enabling basic ACPI support for RISC-V.
1) Add INTC structure in MADT Table -
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#1754
·
|
|
Re: [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Call for Candidates - OS-A SEE TG
Although the deadline has past, it was mentioned at the Software HC meeting
last week that there are no candidates for the vice-chair position, so I
would like to nominate myself.
I have been
Although the deadline has past, it was mentioned at the Software HC meeting
last week that there are no candidates for the vice-chair position, so I
would like to nominate myself.
I have been
|
By
Darius Rad
·
#1753
·
|