We had quite a bit of discussion about SBI versioning in past when we were drafting SBI v0.2 specification. The conclusion of those discussions was: We certainly needed a version for SBI

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Jun 14th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github

Hi All, The slides from today's AIA meeting are here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WHGm7ZpOkVlk_sAVYVU5UwBXt1cdH-8fM1s2vdpY6K4/edit?usp=sharing Both AIA and ACLINT specifications are now

Thanks. I will fix this and the typos below in the next version. Yes, ACPI is mandatory for server extension. I am not sure if we have a standard mechanism yet.

<mchitale@...> wrote: nits: 2 SoB here Is ACPI mandatory? at least Is this mechanism a standard one, or platform specific? at least typo: implement typo: access typo:

This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> ---

This is an initial patch for PCIe requirements for the server extension. The goal is to specify requirements for those PCIe elements which interact with the system such as PCIe config space, memory

One thing that I'd like to see resolved for the 0.3 release is a precise specification for what sbi_probe_extension does. Right now the description says "Returns 0 if the given SBI extension ID (EID)

We have tagged the current SBI specification as a release candidate for v0.3[1]. It is tagged as v0.3-rc1 which includes few new extensions and cosmetic changes of the entire specification. Here is a

Thanks. Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> -- Regards, Atish

Mention that an SBI extension shall not be partially implemented. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...> --- Changes in v2: - %s/a SBI/an SBI - reword the clarification riscv-sbi.adoc | 6

Hi Atish, Okay, I will send v2. Regards, Bin

Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Alistair

Hi Bin, Are you planning to send v2 for this patch or I can modify the text and merge? -- Regards, Atish

Yes. I think it was not reviewed in the past. At least that's what I remember. If I am wrong about that, it's fine. -- Regards, Atish

Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@...> 於 2021年6月5日 週六 上午3:14寫道： Hi Atish, Do you mean to send the patch of PLIC spec on

Στις 2021-06-07 07:03, Anup Patel έγραψε: Totally agree with you, I just thought it'd be a good opportunity to bring this up so that we can discuss it at some point, let's have something

This patch adds SBI performance monitoring unit (PMU) extension which allows S-mode (or VS-mode) software to configure hardware (or firmware) performance counters with help of M-mode (or HS-mode)

Thx Anup, Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...> It's Okay for us, I'll follow that. May I write a new version of Linux implementation with the framework, or you've begun preparing that Linux