|
Re: [PATCH v4] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit
"deprecated" implies is required but will be removed in next version.
Use instead:
"MBR support is not required."
Please, remove this sentence because we do not require to implement
this.
Best
"deprecated" implies is required but will be removed in next version.
Use instead:
"MBR support is not required."
Please, remove this sentence because we do not require to implement
this.
Best
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#937
·
|
|
Re: Next Platform HSC Meeting on Monday May 17 2021 9AM PST
Kumar Sankaran <ksankaran@...> 於 2021年5月15日 週六 下午1:26寫道:
Hi Kunar,
I am not able to join at this time slot. Below is my status update,
1. Restructure the spec of PLIC/CLINT/MTIME
Kumar Sankaran <ksankaran@...> 於 2021年5月15日 週六 下午1:26寫道:
Hi Kunar,
I am not able to join at this time slot. Below is my status update,
1. Restructure the spec of PLIC/CLINT/MTIME
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#936
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] riscv-platform-spec: PLIC and CLINT for Linux-2022 platform
Greg Favor <gfavor@...> 於 2021年5月8日 週六 上午1:25寫道:
Hi Greg,
I am going to restructure the sections for PLIC/CLINT/MTIMER. I am not quite sure your preference of "separate chapters
Greg Favor <gfavor@...> 於 2021年5月8日 週六 上午1:25寫道:
Hi Greg,
I am going to restructure the sections for PLIC/CLINT/MTIMER. I am not quite sure your preference of "separate chapters
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#935
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] System Peripherals: Linux 2022 Base spec and server extension
> +** Platforms are required to provide atleast a 10ns resolution 64-bit counter
nit: "at least a" => "an at least" (the former could be misunderstood as saying to have to provide an exactly 10ns
> +** Platforms are required to provide atleast a 10ns resolution 64-bit counter
nit: "at least a" => "an at least" (the former could be misunderstood as saying to have to provide an exactly 10ns
|
By
Jonathan Behrens <behrensj@...>
·
#934
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 2/2] System Peripherals: Linux 2022 Base spec and server extension
Base spec:
- UART
- Clock and Timers
Server extension:
- Clock and Timers
Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...>
---
riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 44
Base spec:
- UART
- Clock and Timers
Server extension:
- Clock and Timers
Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...>
---
riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 44
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
#933
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 1/2] Updating contributors
Adding myself to list of contributors.
Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...>
---
contributors.adoc | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Adding myself to list of contributors.
Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...>
---
contributors.adoc | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
#932
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 0/2] System Peripherals
This patch describes requirements for the system peripherals
like UART, clock and timers for the Linux-2022 platform
base spec and the server extension.
Changes in V3:
Base spec:
- Clarified
This patch describes requirements for the system peripherals
like UART, clock and timers for the Linux-2022 platform
base spec and the server extension.
Changes in V3:
Base spec:
- Clarified
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
#931
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: Additional requirements to server extension
Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> 於 2021年5月16日 週日 下午9:48寫道:
Yes, one of the reasons for having PRM is to reduce the issue of SMI that brings processors to the highest privilege mode
Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> 於 2021年5月16日 週日 下午9:48寫道:
Yes, one of the reasons for having PRM is to reduce the issue of SMI that brings processors to the highest privilege mode
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#930
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: Additional requirements to server extension
Currently EDK II provides OpenSBI as part of its SEC (Security) code in
edk2-platforms/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/opensbi.
When the hypervisor provides the SEC code we will
Currently EDK II provides OpenSBI as part of its SEC (Security) code in
edk2-platforms/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/opensbi.
When the hypervisor provides the SEC code we will
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#929
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: Additional requirements to server extension
By
Anup Patel
·
#928
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: Additional requirements to server extension
Am 16. Mai 2021 19:13:47 MESZ schrieb Anup Patel <anup.patel@...>:
At least U-Boot relies on OpemSBI for unaligned memory access and may use it for sytem reset. Where will ecalls and exceptions be
Am 16. Mai 2021 19:13:47 MESZ schrieb Anup Patel <anup.patel@...>:
At least U-Boot relies on OpemSBI for unaligned memory access and may use it for sytem reset. Where will ecalls and exceptions be
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#927
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: Additional requirements to server extension
Hi,
Please note that we should consider that Guest/VM will be directly running in VS-mode (S-mode without hypervisor capabilities) so UEFI firmware will be running entirely in S-mode inside Guest/VM
Hi,
Please note that we should consider that Guest/VM will be directly running in VS-mode (S-mode without hypervisor capabilities) so UEFI firmware will be running entirely in S-mode inside Guest/VM
|
By
Anup Patel
·
#926
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit
Hi Rahul,
NIT: specifies -> specify
Hi Rahul,
NIT: specifies -> specify
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#925
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: Additional requirements to server extension
Hi Abner,
My understanding is, these features are introduced to reduce some of the
issues with SMM mode in x86. I am not sure whether we will have similar
issues in risc-v and need to make this
Hi Abner,
My understanding is, these features are introduced to reduce some of the
issues with SMM mode in x86. I am not sure whether we will have similar
issues in risc-v and need to make this
|
By
Sunil V L
·
#924
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit
Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...> 於 2021年5月12日 週三 下午5:30寫道:
I give my RB for this patch below to keep this work moves on.
I would like to have the statement in the Server extension
Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...> 於 2021年5月12日 週三 下午5:30寫道:
I give my RB for this patch below to keep this work moves on.
I would like to have the statement in the Server extension
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#923
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Monday May 17 2021 9AM PST
Hi All,
The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Monday May 17th 9AM PST.
Please note the new time of 9AM PST for this meeting. This change to 9AM PST
is only for the May 17th session due to
Hi All,
The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Monday May 17th 9AM PST.
Please note the new time of 9AM PST for this meeting. This change to 9AM PST
is only for the May 17th session due to
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
#922
·
|
|
[PATCH v6] Add performance monitoring unit extension
This patch adds SBI performance monitoring unit (PMU) extension which
allows S-mode (or VS-mode) software to configure hardware (or firmware)
performance counters with help of M-mode (or HS-mode)
This patch adds SBI performance monitoring unit (PMU) extension which
allows S-mode (or VS-mode) software to configure hardware (or firmware)
performance counters with help of M-mode (or HS-mode)
|
By
Anup Patel
·
#921
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] System Peripherals: Linux 2022 Base spec and server extension
Actually these are different requirements. From the software perspective the counter is required to have atleast 10 ns resolution. But the hardware clock that drives the counter is expected to run at
Actually these are different requirements. From the software perspective the counter is required to have atleast 10 ns resolution. But the hardware clock that drives the counter is expected to run at
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
#920
·
|
|
Slides from today's AIA meeting
Hi All,
The slides from today's AIA meeting are here:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_wkvY8rtffA_TS0vbUXySH2NKhtLO9ZLvzbIYCjzCE4/edit?usp=sharing
Initial ACLINT (or CLINTv2) proposal is
Hi All,
The slides from today's AIA meeting are here:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_wkvY8rtffA_TS0vbUXySH2NKhtLO9ZLvzbIYCjzCE4/edit?usp=sharing
Initial ACLINT (or CLINTv2) proposal is
|
By
Anup Patel
·
#919
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit
Ping for review
By
Rahul Pathak
·
#918
·
|