tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [PATCH v2] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit

Linux2022 name is going to change and its just a placeholder for now. The platform specs builds upon the ISA level profiles A and M. Linux2022 corresponds to A profile (RVA2022) where we are

By Rahul Pathak · #757 ·

Re: The clarifications to 4/19 meeting

Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@...> 於 2021年4月22日週四上午5:33寫道： Don't get me wrong. I also agree with this point. I never thought to spec Linuxboot out in platform spec at this moment. I

By Abner Chang · #756 ·

Re: The clarifications to 4/19 meeting

Agreed. There are lot of moving pieces with LinuxBoot for RISC-V at this moment. I would suggest to have the Linux-2022 version with UEFI. We can include LinuxBoot in the future version as an

By atishp@... · #755 ·

Re: The clarifications to 4/19 meeting

EDK II is available for RISC-V. So there is at least one compliant UEFI implementation. LinuxBoot might be used to boot into a Linux via kexec instead of UEFI but kexec excludes running any other

By Heinrich Schuchardt · #754 ·

Re: The clarifications to 4/19 meeting

I'm not sure I follow #1. How can I write an operating system for the Server2022 platform without knowing what firmware framework will be in use? Jonathan

By Jonathan Behrens <behrensj@...> · #753 ·

Re: Do we have owner for section 1.1.3 PLIC + CLINT

Hi Abner, Just to clarify, PLIC + CLINT is still required for the base spec (section 1.13) since there are platforms out there. ACPI is mandatory only for the server extension. For this class

By Sunil V L · #752 ·

Re: Do we have owner for section 1.1.3 PLIC + CLINT

Yes, Sunil. I think you and your company is the owner of ACPI of APLIC for AIA. :) PLIC could be the low-cost interrupt controller for the small platform (maybe not server) which also runs the ACPI

By Abner Chang · #751 ·

The clarifications to 4/19 meeting

Hi all, I would like to give clarifications to some of the discussions in this week's meeting. 1. UEFI as the mandatory firmware. I brought up this because it is not necessary to mention we must

By Abner Chang · #750 ·

Re: [PATCH v2] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit

My reviews are inline below which is apart from the below recommendations if you don't think that is better. We have Linux2022 as the base feature set for all kinds of platform, however, there are

By Abner Chang · #749 ·

Re: Do we have owner for section 1.1.3 PLIC + CLINT

Hi Abner, We are mandating APLIC for AIA for server extension with ACPI. So, legacy PLIC is not required for ACPI. Thanks Sunil

By Sunil V L · #748 ·

Re: Do we have owner for section 1.1.3 PLIC + CLINT

Hi Abner, We don’t have an owner for the PLIC + CLINT section 1.1.3. Please go ahead and send out a patch to the mailing list for review. Regards Kumar

By Kumar Sankaran · #747 ·

Do we have owner for section 1.1.3 PLIC + CLINT

Hi all, Do we currently have an owner for section 1.1.3 PLIC + CLINT?https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/blob/main/riscv-platform-spec.adoc#113-interrupt-controller If no, could I send the

By Abner Chang · #746 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv-platform-spec: Initial server firmware requirements

Hi Abner, Meeting recordings will be uploaded @ https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki. Regards, Sunil

By Sunil V L · #745 ·

[PATCH v2] Base boot and runtime requirements - initial commit

Initial changes for the Base Boot & Runtime requirements. The sections which are currently in-progress are marked as TBD. These changes can serve as the starting point and more details/changes can be

By Rahul Pathak · #744 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv-platform-spec: Initial server firmware requirements

Hi Anup and Sunil, I think I missed the meeting this week. I thought it is Tuesday 11pm my time, however it is Monday actually. I was confused by the time zone. Sorry about that, I should get on

By Abner Chang · #743 ·

Re: [PULL 0/3] Initial PR for the Embedded-2022 spec

Merged Regards Kumar

By Kumar Sankaran · #742 ·

Re: [PULL 0/3] Initial PR for the Embedded-2022 spec

Ping! >

By Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> · #741 ·

Next platform meeting on Monday Apr 19 2021 8AM PST

Hi All, The next platform meeting is scheduled on Monday Apr 19th 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki Here

By Kumar Sankaran · #740 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv-platform-spec: Initial server firmware requirements

Hi Anup, thanks for giving me this information. Yes, I did miss most of the meetings. Sorry about I am not able to join this meeting in the past. Now I get more understanding of the organization of

By Abner Chang · #739 ·

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv-platform-spec: Initial server firmware requirements

Hi Abner, I think you missed lot of previous discussions/meetings. The RISC-V platform spec will define various classes of platforms targeting different use-cases. This particular patch adds

By Anup Patel · #738 ·

1101 - 1120 of 1857

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms