|
Platform Spec Technical Feedback
Obviously not. PMP is the only standard method for protecting M-mode runtime code specified by ISA. That's why, it is mandated in platform spec and OpenSBI uses it. If the RISC-V allows any other stan
|
Obviously not. PMP is the only standard method for protecting M-mode runtime code specified by ISA. That's why, it is mandated in platform spec and OpenSBI uses it. If the RISC-V allows any other stan
|
By
atishp@...
· #1348
·
|
|
Platform Spec Technical Feedback
In this case, it was just not updated in the webpage. I have raised a github issue[1] for that. RISC-V specific changes were merged in v2.0.1. That's why, it is referred in the platform spec. https://
|
In this case, it was just not updated in the webpage. I have raised a github issue[1] for that. RISC-V specific changes were merged in v2.0.1. That's why, it is referred in the platform spec. https://
|
By
atishp@...
· #1347
·
|
|
Fix a typo in RISC-V SBI documentation
Thanks for the fix. I have merged the fix as it is a minor typo. For future reference, please send the patches to the mailing list directly as more folks are watching the mailing list rather than gith
|
Thanks for the fix. I have merged the fix as it is a minor typo. For future reference, please send the patches to the mailing list directly as more folks are watching the mailing list rather than gith
|
By
atishp@...
· #1298
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 8/8] Simplify the timer support for the M platform
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1276
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 7/8] Don't remove images in make clean
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1275
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 6/8] Follow profile naming as-per latest RISC-V profiles spec
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1274
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 4/8] Re-write the interrupts and timer section
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1273
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 1/6] Additional requirements for H-extension
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1258
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 2/6] Update terminology and specification tables
Currently, there is no released version of the PLIC spec. We should add that to a TODO list before the platform spec goes out for a public review. It should be "v2.0.1" Not sure if we should refer to
|
Currently, there is no released version of the PLIC spec. We should add that to a TODO list before the platform spec goes out for a public review. It should be "v2.0.1" Not sure if we should refer to
|
By
atishp@...
· #1257
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 3/6] Move terminology and specifications tables to correct location
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1255
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 6/6] Follow profile naming as-per latest RISC-V profiles spec
Here are more details on profile naming convention https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/master/profiles.adoc However, the current draft profile spec doesn't event mention about these terms (RV
|
Here are more details on profile naming convention https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/master/profiles.adoc However, the current draft profile spec doesn't event mention about these terms (RV
|
By
atishp@...
· #1254
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 5/6] Minor cosmetic changes in SBI section of OS/A-base platform
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1253
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 4/6] Re-write the interrupts and timer section
These categories can be subsections instead of just bullets. Just to align with other options: "Legacy wired IRQs" will be better /s/legacy/existing ? Most of the platform released in next couple of y
|
These categories can be subsections instead of just bullets. Just to align with other options: "Legacy wired IRQs" will be better /s/legacy/existing ? Most of the platform released in next couple of y
|
By
atishp@...
· #1252
·
|
|
[PATCH v2] Add an ISA requirement section
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
|
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
|
By
atishp@...
· #1195
·
|
|
[PATCH] Add an ISA requirement section
Makes sense. I will update the patch. Thanks.
|
Makes sense. I will update the patch. Thanks.
|
By
atishp@...
· #1194
·
|
|
[PATCH] Add an ISA requirement section
ok. I will update it. Just a suggestion: Is it better to say what must be supported rather what is not and be more verbose? Something like this: Platforms is allowed to operate only in little-endian m
|
ok. I will update it. Just a suggestion: Is it better to say what must be supported rather what is not and be more verbose? Something like this: Platforms is allowed to operate only in little-endian m
|
By
atishp@...
· #1192
·
|
|
[PATCH] Add an ISA requirement section
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
|
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
|
By
atishp@...
· #1190
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc
I thought it is already decided that it will be part of the RVA22 profile spec. It seems that it is not yet added to the RVA22 profile spec. Is there a draft version of the RVA22 profile spec that we
|
I thought it is already decided that it will be part of the RVA22 profile spec. It seems that it is not yet added to the RVA22 profile spec. Is there a draft version of the RVA22 profile spec that we
|
By
atishp@...
· #1173
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...>
|
By
atishp@...
· #1168
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 3/3] Add PMU section
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-plat
|
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-plat
|
By
atishp@...
· #1167
·
|
