This is the initial server firmware specification which mandates additional requirements for server platforms compared to base specification. This is not the final version. Many dependencies and granu

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- changelog.adoc | 2 +- contributors.adoc | 4 ++-- licensing.adoc | 2 +- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 delet

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- contributors.adoc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/contributors.adoc b/contributors.adoc index 541128d..2c644

This specifies mandatory requirements for server class platforms in addition to the requirements in base specification. Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- changelog.adoc | 4 ++ li

Hi Heinrich, I agree that UEFI spec doesn't mandate EFI_LOAD_FILE2_PROTOCOL. However, I thought EFI_LOAD_FILE_PROTOCOL is necessary as per 3.1.2 of UEFI spec. For server platforms, I think we should h

I think this is a very generic statement and may not be correct to point to platform policy spec always. For ex: How about some definition used here which is defined by some other spec like profile sp

Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...>

Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> Thanks Sunil

Sure. Make sense. Thanks!

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...> --- changelog.adoc | 2 +- contributors.adoc | 4

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> --- contributors.adoc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/contributors.adoc b/contributors.adoc index 541128d..2c644

This specifies mandatory requirements for server class platforms in addition to the requirements in base specification. Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> Changes in V2: - Aligned to

Hi Abner, Thanks a lot for your review. I agree that we should try to limit the scope of the platform spec to RISC-V. However, the platform spec is not only defining RISC-V specific things. It is defi

Hi Abner, It is correct that server extension chapter is similar to SBBR. We are not specifying any implementations here. U-Boot/EDK2/Linuxboot all are different types of firmware implementations in m

One criteria for server spec is to support different OSs including windows. As per https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=LinuxBoot-Can-Boot-Windows Linuxboot booted windows supporting UE

Hi Abner, Yes, That's the correct repo. We just started with these initial patches. -Sunil

Hi Abner, Meeting recordings will be uploaded @ https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki. Regards, Sunil

Hi Abner, We are mandating APLIC for AIA for server extension with ACPI. So, legacy PLIC is not required for ACPI. Thanks Sunil

Hi Abner, Just to clarify, PLIC + CLINT is still required for the base spec (section 1.13) since there are platforms out there. ACPI is mandatory only for the server extension. For this class of platf

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...> --- changelog.adoc | 2 +- contributors.adoc | 4