Mark Himelstein (cto riscv) is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: Mark Himelstein (cto riscv)'s Personal Meeting Room Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/4094940114 Meeting ID: 409 494 0

An issue is being raised in RVI over the overloaded naming of arch features, profile names, and platform names using "M". At an arch level, M mode is officially established. But then there are RVM* pr

As per feedback, reduced basic UEFI requirements to 2.6.1 of the UEFI spec. Added reason to understand why additional protocols need to be supported on top of basic requirements. Signed-off-by: Sunil

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.adoc in

Yesterday the Arch Review committee (including most notably Krste and Andrew) discussed the issue raised over the past week and in Monday's Platforms group meeting - as part of a more general discussi

Hi All, As per our discussion during the Platform HSC meeting today, I have scheduled an additional meeting Mon Oct 25th 2021 at 8AM PST. The topics for this additional meeting are 1. Whether M-mode f

You have been invited to the following event. Platform HSC Additional Meeting: M-mode features in Platform Spec When Mon Oct 25, 2021 8am – 9am Pacific Time - Los Angeles Where https://zoom.us/j/27860

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Oct 18th 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Hi, After reading through the platform spec I have some feedback on the technical side of things (different from the scoping of intention in my general feedback email). 1. Zam required, but as far as

Hi, I went through the policy document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U5qLoztZpCRSnw2s8tx4rB0SFPMQ27Svrr9jWRsOziY) as well as the platform spec itself (https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-sp

Hey folks, I have been following along with the addition of the addition of the Performance Monitoring Unit Extension that was added to SBI in v0.3. I noticed that it has not been implemented in the R

The draft of the RISC-V platform specification available as https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/blob/main/riscv-platform-spec.adoc requires conformance to: - RVA22U profile for user-mode. -

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Oct 4th 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Sep 20th 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Comments after review with Canonical in RED Regards Kumar

sit in SBI and that Linux should rely on UEFI firmware calling it. Hello Bin, I am copying in tech-unixplatformspec@... because we should add a reason for this design decision in the specification. Li

From: Dong Du <dd_nirvana@...> Signed-off-by: Dong Du <dd_nirvana@...> --- riscv-sbi.adoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/riscv-sbi.adoc b/riscv-sbi.adoc index 4855cf

Hello, I've pushed a fix for typo in github pull request: Fix a typo in SBI documentation by luojia65 · Pull Request #79 · riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc (github.com) Please review, thanks :) Luo Jia @lu

Hi, Does anyone know why the RV22A profile draft (https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/blob/main/riscv-platform-spec.adoc) mandates the following: misa If the H extension is supported then th

Dear Kumar, please, see my comments below. Yes the time is fine. I will forward the mail internally. Overall the platform specification requires that the reader is quite familiar at least with the ISA