On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:11 PM Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...> wrote: Out of curiosity, do you have a system you're designing that uses a custom alternative to PMP? Yes, we have an internal doc, and we in

Hi All, The meeting minutes for this meeting are uploaded to our usual location on platform wiki here https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki/2021.11.01:-Working-Group-Meeting Decisions tak

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Nov 1st 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Hi All, As per the platform HSC meeting on 10/25/2021 at 8AM PST, the following was agreed by a majority of participants on the call as well as past participants and multiple distro reviewers: The M-m

As per feedback, reduced basic UEFI requirements to 2.6.1 of the UEFI spec. Added reason to understand why additional protocols need to be supported on top of basic requirements. Signed-off-by: Sunil

Mark Himelstein (cto riscv) is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: Mark Himelstein (cto riscv)'s Personal Meeting Room Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/4094940114 Meeting ID: 409 494 0

An issue is being raised in RVI over the overloaded naming of arch features, profile names, and platform names using "M". At an arch level, M mode is officially established. But then there are RVM* pr

As per feedback, reduced basic UEFI requirements to 2.6.1 of the UEFI spec. Added reason to understand why additional protocols need to be supported on top of basic requirements. Signed-off-by: Sunil

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.adoc in

Yesterday the Arch Review committee (including most notably Krste and Andrew) discussed the issue raised over the past week and in Monday's Platforms group meeting - as part of a more general discussi

Hi All, As per our discussion during the Platform HSC meeting today, I have scheduled an additional meeting Mon Oct 25th 2021 at 8AM PST. The topics for this additional meeting are 1. Whether M-mode f

You have been invited to the following event. Platform HSC Additional Meeting: M-mode features in Platform Spec When Mon Oct 25, 2021 8am – 9am Pacific Time - Los Angeles Where https://zoom.us/j/27860

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Oct 18th 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Hi, After reading through the platform spec I have some feedback on the technical side of things (different from the scoping of intention in my general feedback email). 1. Zam required, but as far as

Hi, I went through the policy document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U5qLoztZpCRSnw2s8tx4rB0SFPMQ27Svrr9jWRsOziY) as well as the platform spec itself (https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-sp

Hey folks, I have been following along with the addition of the addition of the Performance Monitoring Unit Extension that was added to SBI in v0.3. I noticed that it has not been implemented in the R

The draft of the RISC-V platform specification available as https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/blob/main/riscv-platform-spec.adoc requires conformance to: - RVA22U profile for user-mode. -

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Oct 4th 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Sep 20th 2021 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki

Comments after review with Canonical in RED Regards Kumar