|
[PATCH 1/1] Proposal to add Coffer to the SBI impl IDs list
Hello everyone, This is a proposal to add Coffer Trusted Execution Environment(TEE) as a new member of SBI Implementations List. Coffer is a TEE implemented for RISC-V 32/64 systems. It utilizes the m
Hello everyone, This is a proposal to add Coffer Trusted Execution Environment(TEE) as a new member of SBI Implementations List. Coffer is a TEE implemented for RISC-V 32/64 systems. It utilizes the m
|
By
John Lu
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jul 26th 2021 8AM PST
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon July 26th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki Her
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon July 26th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki Her
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
[PATCH v2] Add an ISA requirement section
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH] Add an ISA requirement section
5 messages
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
There are few ISA level requirements/strong recommendations that platform should follow. Create an new subsection to contain all these requirements. Move the user-level requirements from user.doc to h
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[tech-aia] RISC-V ACLINT specification is now hosted on RISC-V GitHub
10 messages
> The MTIME register is a 64-bit read-write register Is the device required to allow only 64-bit accesses to these registers? Can a device allow 32-bit accesses? Can a device only support 32-bit acces
> The MTIME register is a 64-bit read-write register Is the device required to allow only 64-bit accesses to these registers? Can a device allow 32-bit accesses? Can a device only support 32-bit acces
|
By
Josh Scheid
·
|
|
[PATCH v1 1/1] Server extension: PCIe - AIA requirements
This patch adds requirements for mapping PCIe interrupts to AIA. Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(
This patch adds requirements for mapping PCIe interrupts to AIA. Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc
8 messages
The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must be
The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must be
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa | 28 ++++++++ riscv-platform-spec.adoc
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa | 28 ++++++++ riscv-platform-spec.adoc
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe
V5: - Improve text for PCIe cache coherency requirement. V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer transactions V3
V5: - Improve text for PCIe cache coherency requirement. V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer transactions V3
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements
3 messages
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa | 28 ++++++++ riscv-platform-spec.adoc
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa | 28 ++++++++ riscv-platform-spec.adoc
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 3/3] Add PMU section
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 1/3] Remove old & redundant sections.
The platform and profile specification mean different things now. All the points specified in supervisor.adoc are already described in the new revamped platform spec. Remove these old specifications.
The platform and profile specification mean different things now. All the points specified in supervisor.adoc are already described in the new revamped platform spec. Remove these old specifications.
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe
V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer transactions V3: - Replaced references to PMA+PBMT by PMA - Moved the PC
V4: - Fix Pcie cache coherency requirement to use 'No_Snoop bit' instead of 'No_snoop' - Removed empty section for peer-to-peer transactions V3: - Replaced references to PMA+PBMT by PMA - Moved the PC
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 1/1] server extension: PCIe requirements
4 messages
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa | 28 ++++++++ riscv-platform-spec.adoc
This patch adds requirements for PCIe support for the server extension Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...> --- Makefile | 18 +++-- pcie-topology.ditaa | 28 ++++++++ riscv-platform-spec.adoc
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
[PATCH] riscv-platform-spec: ACPI for OS-A Base Spec
ACPI Requirement for OS-A Base Discovery mechanism. This requirement adds ACPI as an choice for discovery mechanism which firmware can implement. In case the firmware supports both Devicetree and ACPI
ACPI Requirement for OS-A Base Discovery mechanism. This requirement adds ACPI as an choice for discovery mechanism which firmware can implement. In case the firmware supports both Devicetree and ACPI
|
By
Rahul Pathak
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jul 12th 2021 8AM PST
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon July 12th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki Her
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon July 12th at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki Her
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
[PATCH 3/3] Add PMU section
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.ad
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.ad
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/3] Remove the old descriptions from user-level.adoc
The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must be
The first three details belong to a profile specification rather than platform spec. Remove those so that it can be included in the profile. The last remaining one belongs to platform spec but must be
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/3] Remove old & redundant sections.
The platform and profile specification mean different things now. All the points specified in supervisor.adoc are already described in the new revamped platform spec. Remove these old specifications.
The platform and profile specification mean different things now. All the points specified in supervisor.adoc are already described in the new revamped platform spec. Remove these old specifications.
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 0/1] System peripherals - PCIe
V3: - Replaced references to PMA+PBMT by PMA - Moved the PCIe topology diagram to a separate adoc to enable it's inclusion into PDF V2: - Fixed abbreviation for root complex integrated endpoint - Adde
V3: - Replaced references to PMA+PBMT by PMA - Moved the PCIe topology diagram to a separate adoc to enable it's inclusion into PDF V2: - Fixed abbreviation for root complex integrated endpoint - Adde
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|