|
SBI Debug Trigger Extension Proposal (Draft v4)
Hi All, To support native debugging in S-mode and VS-mode, we need a SBI Debug Trigger extension which complements the Sdtrig extension. Below is the draft proposal of the SBI Debug Trigger Extension.
Hi All, To support native debugging in S-mode and VS-mode, we need a SBI Debug Trigger extension which complements the Sdtrig extension. Below is the draft proposal of the SBI Debug Trigger Extension.
|
By
Anup Patel
·
|
|
[RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unprivileged] Direction of Identifying Extensions
7 messages
To add on to Alan's point. These "extension" names were created simply to represent individual line items in the Profiles. In many cases these represent a one or two sentence statement in a Profile ab
To add on to Alan's point. These "extension" names were created simply to represent individual line items in the Profiles. In many cases these represent a one or two sentence statement in a Profile ab
|
By
Greg Favor
·
|
|
[RISC-V] [tech-aia] [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
8 messages
FYI: here is a rough initial draft of the architectural options that I've been able to dig up. I know that this is very, very likely to be incomplete. This is written from the perspective of how to ma
FYI: here is a rough initial draft of the architectural options that I've been able to dig up. I know that this is very, very likely to be incomplete. This is written from the perspective of how to ma
|
By
Allen Baum
·
|
|
[RISC-V][privileged-software] [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unprivileged] Direction of Identifying Extensions
2 messages
Duplicating the information (i.e. having the individual extensions marked and the profile itself indicated) seems like an error-prone proposal, unless we mandate/enforce consistency checking. Given th
Duplicating the information (i.e. having the individual extensions marked and the profile itself indicated) seems like an error-prone proposal, unless we mandate/enforce consistency checking. Given th
|
By
Philipp Tomsich
·
|
|
[RISC-V] [tech-unprivileged] Direction of Identifying Extensions
3 messages
If you're looking at the same thing I was looking at: the "extension names" are not extensions, in the usual sense. They are names for the values of architectural options of extensions that already ex
If you're looking at the same thing I was looking at: the "extension names" are not extensions, in the usual sense. They are names for the values of architectural options of extensions that already ex
|
By
Allen Baum
·
|
|
[RISC-V] [tech-unprivileged] Direction of Identifying Extensions
2 messages
I'm also unclear of the "identifier" you mention for other unmentioned option value (e.g. your 64b cache block size example). Who is the consumer of that identifier? Is this a value you would expect t
I'm also unclear of the "identifier" you mention for other unmentioned option value (e.g. your 64b cache block size example). Who is the consumer of that identifier? Is this a value you would expect t
|
By
Allen Baum
·
|
|
[RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
5 messages
Hi, I'm top posting with some notes that Furquan helped me put together to cover the things we've been talking about. We may want to put these and future notes somewhere else (drive, github, etc) so p
Hi, I'm top posting with some notes that Furquan helped me put together to cover the things we've been talking about. We may want to put these and future notes somewhere else (drive, github, etc) so p
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
|
|
[RISC-V] [tech-aia] [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
6 messages
I think of UD being orthogonal to this discussion. Firmware world | OS world | [UD, etc. ]---firmware builds-+->[ACPI/DT]--->OS | | So the comments about early boot etc. in this thread I read as refer
I think of UD being orthogonal to this discussion. Firmware world | OS world | [UD, etc. ]---firmware builds-+->[ACPI/DT]--->OS | | So the comments about early boot etc. in this thread I read as refer
|
By
Ved Shanbhogue
·
|
|
[RISC-V] [tech-aia] [RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] Review request for ACPI ECRs
Hi Aaron, Few comments below ... Rather than gating these ACPI ECR efforts on AIA spec being frozen. We should start sending out incremental ECRs for the things that are already ratified. Each ECR wil
Hi Aaron, Few comments below ... Rather than gating these ACPI ECR efforts on AIA spec being frozen. We should start sending out incremental ECRs for the things that are already ratified. Each ECR wil
|
By
Anup Patel
·
|
|
Direction of Identifying Extensions
Hi All, First off, please redirect me where the most appropriate forum is to discuss this topic. I am casting a fairly wide net, but that's just trying to cover those who are impacted. We can convene
Hi All, First off, please redirect me where the most appropriate forum is to discuss this topic. I am casting a fairly wide net, but that's just trying to cover those who are impacted. We can convene
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
|
|
Review request for ACPI ECRs
2 messages
Hi All, Please review below Engineering Change Request (ECR) to update the ACPI spec for enabling basic ACPI support for RISC-V. 1) Add INTC structure in MADT Table - https://docs.google.com/document/
Hi All, Please review below Engineering Change Request (ECR) to update the ACPI spec for enabling basic ACPI support for RISC-V. 1) Add INTC structure in MADT Table - https://docs.google.com/document/
|
By
Sunil V L
·
|
|
[RISC-V] [tech-aia] Invitation: Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2 @ Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm - 10:30pm (IST) (tech-aia@lists.riscv.org)
Sunil Hi - July 4 is a holiday in the US. COuld we meet on 5th? regards ved
Sunil Hi - July 4 is a holiday in the US. COuld we meet on 5th? regards ved
|
By
Ved Shanbhogue
·
|
|
Invitation: Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2 @ Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm - 10:30pm (IST) (tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org)
You have been invited to the following event. Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2 When Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata Joining info Join with Google Meet meet.google
You have been invited to the following event. Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting - Part 2 When Mon Jul 4, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata Joining info Join with Google Meet meet.google
|
By
Sunil V L
·
|
|
[RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Review request for ACPI ECRs
4 messages
Hello Sunil, Thanks for sending out these ECRs. After looking at these documents, we have a lot of comments/questions, but I think it might be productive to walk through the assumptions and approach f
Hello Sunil, Thanks for sending out these ECRs. After looking at these documents, we have a lot of comments/questions, but I think it might be productive to walk through the assumptions and approach f
|
By
Furquan Shaikh
·
|
|
SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v2)
7 messages
Hi All, Based on feedback, below is the updated draft proposal of the SBI Debug Console Extension ... The motivations behind this proposal is as follows: 1) There is no new SBI extension replacing the
Hi All, Based on feedback, below is the updated draft proposal of the SBI Debug Console Extension ... The motivations behind this proposal is as follows: 1) There is no new SBI extension replacing the
|
By
Anup Patel
·
|
|
Invitation: Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting @ Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:30pm - 10:30pm (IST) (tech-unixplatformspec@lists.riscv.org)
You have been invited to the following event. Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting When Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata Joining info Join with Google Meet meet.google.com/dao
You have been invited to the following event. Ad-hoc ACPI ECR Review meeting When Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:30pm – 10:30pm India Standard Time - Kolkata Joining info Join with Google Meet meet.google.com/dao
|
By
Sunil V L
·
|
|
[RISC-V][tech-os-a-see] Call for Candidates - OS-A SEE TG
Although the deadline has past, it was mentioned at the Software HC meeting last week that there are no candidates for the vice-chair position, so I would like to nominate myself. I have been involved
Although the deadline has past, it was mentioned at the Software HC meeting last week that there are no candidates for the vice-chair position, so I would like to nominate myself. I have been involved
|
By
Darius Rad
·
|
|
SBI changes
8 messages
we have seen a number of SBI changes proposed (debug console, ap tee, ...). will there be one big rev ala priv 1.12, small fast tracks , something else? I also suggest that this either needs to be run
we have seen a number of SBI changes proposed (debug console, ap tee, ...). will there be one big rev ala priv 1.12, small fast tracks , something else? I also suggest that this either needs to be run
|
By
mark
·
|
|
SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v1)
21 messages
Hi All, Below is the draft proposal for SBI Debug Console Extension. Please review it and provide feedback. Thanks, Anup Debug Console Extension (EID #0x4442434E "DBCN") ==============================
Hi All, Below is the draft proposal for SBI Debug Console Extension. Please review it and provide feedback. Thanks, Anup Debug Console Extension (EID #0x4442434E "DBCN") ==============================
|
By
Anup Patel
·
|
|
[sig-hypervisors] [RISC-V] [tech-unixplatformspec] SBI Debug Console Extension Proposal (Draft v1)
11 messages
That is because it is useful to have debug console output when porting a hypervisor or baremetal code to a new board. Of course, if a hypervisor is already available for the board, then it would be ju
That is because it is useful to have debug console output when porting a hypervisor or baremetal code to a new board. Of course, if a hypervisor is already available for the board, then it would be ju
|
By
Stefano Stabellini
·
|