|
Public review of RISC-V UEFI Protocol Specification
2 messages
This is to announce the start of the public review period for the RISC-V UEFI Protocol specification. This specification is considered as frozen now as per the RISC-V International policies. The revie
This is to announce the start of the public review period for the RISC-V UEFI Protocol specification. This specification is considered as frozen now as per the RISC-V International policies. The revie
|
By
Sunil V L
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting
Hi All, Due to lack of a full agenda, I am canceling the next platform HSC meeting on Monday Mar 21st 2022. This way, people can use this time to attend other RISC-V meetings. In terms of the discussi
Hi All, Due to lack of a full agenda, I am canceling the next platform HSC meeting on Monday Mar 21st 2022. This way, people can use this time to attend other RISC-V meetings. In terms of the discussi
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
OS-A SEE TG Infrastructure
Hi All, I wanted to point out that we have GitHub repositories and a mailing list for OS-A SEE (Supervisor Execution Environment) TG. Please join if you are interested. GitHub Admin: https://github.co
Hi All, I wanted to point out that we have GitHub repositories and a mailing list for OS-A SEE (Supervisor Execution Environment) TG. Please join if you are interested. GitHub Admin: https://github.co
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Mar 7th 2022 8AM PST
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Mar 7th 2022 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Mar 7th 2022 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
Watchdog timer per hart?
14 messages
Is it expected that there should be a watchdog timer and timeout signal per hart in the system, or is okay for there to be one timer in the system and for the timeout signal to be delivered to a speci
Is it expected that there should be a watchdog timer and timeout signal per hart in the system, or is okay for there to be one timer in the system and for the timeout signal to be delivered to a speci
|
By
James Robinson
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Wed Feb 23rd 2022 9AM PST
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Wed Feb 23rd 2022 at 9AM PST. This meeting is moved to Wed as Monday Feb 21st is a holiday for President's Day in the US. Here are the details: Ag
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Wed Feb 23rd 2022 at 9AM PST. This meeting is moved to Wed as Monday Feb 21st is a holiday for President's Day in the US. Here are the details: Ag
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
Possible progress on M Platform?
3 messages
Hi all, I lead the CPU software / SDK team at Imagination Technologies, we are entering the RISC-V space but I'm still quite new around here. At present we are most interested in embedded applications
Hi all, I lead the CPU software / SDK team at Imagination Technologies, we are entering the RISC-V space but I'm still quite new around here. At present we are most interested in embedded applications
|
By
Chris Owen
·
|
|
[PATCH] UEFI: Add RISCV_EFI_BOOT_PROTOCOL requirement
2 messages
RISC-V UEFI systems need to support new RISCV_BOOT_PROTOCOL. This protocol is required to communicate the boot hart ID from firmware to the bootloader/kernel. This protocol specification is maintained
RISC-V UEFI systems need to support new RISCV_BOOT_PROTOCOL. This protocol is required to communicate the boot hart ID from firmware to the bootloader/kernel. This protocol specification is maintained
|
By
Sunil V L
·
|
|
Configuration Structure Review
Hi all! I just sent this to tech-chairs, but due to the nature of your work Stephano suggested getting feedback here as well. The Configuration Structure task group has been working on how software ca
Hi all! I just sent this to tech-chairs, but due to the nature of your work Stephano suggested getting feedback here as well. The Configuration Structure task group has been working on how software ca
|
By
Tim Newsome
·
|
|
Public review of Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI) Specification
17 messages
I just realized that the below email was not delivered to unix platform mailing list and linux-riscv mailing list because of the attachment. Reseeding it again without the attachment. Apologies for th
I just realized that the below email was not delivered to unix platform mailing list and linux-riscv mailing list because of the attachment. Reseeding it again without the attachment. Apologies for th
|
By
atishp@...
·
|
|
Introduction Update and OS-A Motivation
Hi All, I submitted a pull request to the platform spec repo: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/pull/75 This is definitely a WIP, but I wanted to start the conversation. Much of the langua
Hi All, I submitted a pull request to the platform spec repo: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/pull/75 This is definitely a WIP, but I wanted to start the conversation. Much of the langua
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
|
|
Specifying Cache Granule Size in Platform
3 messages
Hi All, During the Platform HSC the topic of specifying an expected cache granule size for a platform was brought up. Below are some thoughts/observations on the topic. The purpose of this email is to
Hi All, During the Platform HSC the topic of specifying an expected cache granule size for a platform was brought up. Below are some thoughts/observations on the topic. The purpose of this email is to
|
By
Aaron Durbin
·
|
|
Mandating of RVA22 S and U ISA Profiles in OS-A platform specs
5 messages
All, Recently a PR was sent out to remove U and VU mode standardization from the platform spec scope. Which is sort of right and sort of wrong. I brought this issue up with Krste and Andrew (especiall
All, Recently a PR was sent out to remove U and VU mode standardization from the platform spec scope. Which is sort of right and sort of wrong. I brought this issue up with Krste and Andrew (especiall
|
By
Greg Favor
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jan 24th 2022 8AM PST
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Jan 24th 2022 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Jan 24th 2022 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
[PATCH] Remove stoptime requirement
2 messages
Signed-off-by: Paul Donahue <pdonahue@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.adoc index 23
Signed-off-by: Paul Donahue <pdonahue@...> --- riscv-platform-spec.adoc | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/riscv-platform-spec.adoc b/riscv-platform-spec.adoc index 23
|
By
Paul Donahue
·
|
|
Review request: New EFI_RISCV_BOOT_PROTOCOL
12 messages
Hi All, As we discussed in the Platform HSC meeting today, here is the document which details a new RISC-V specific EFI protocol. https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-uefi/releases/download/0.1/EFI_
Hi All, As we discussed in the Platform HSC meeting today, here is the document which details a new RISC-V specific EFI protocol. https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-uefi/releases/download/0.1/EFI_
|
By
Sunil V L
·
|
|
OS-A platform stoptime requirement
21 messages
Hi there, In the OS-A platform spec I see the following requirement: • dcsr.stopcount and dcsr.stoptime must be supported and the reset value of each must be 1 ◦ Rationale: The architecture has strict
Hi there, In the OS-A platform spec I see the following requirement: • dcsr.stopcount and dcsr.stoptime must be supported and the reset value of each must be 1 ◦ Rationale: The architecture has strict
|
By
Beeman Strong
·
|
|
[PATCH] Updated PCIe sections 4.7.3.4 and 4.7.3.5
As discussed on the mailing list: - 4.7.3.4 - Fixed typo - Added clarification for requests with NS=1, RO=0 - 4.7.3.5 - Added topology depicting a RP, RCiEP, RCEC on the root bus - Removed constraint
As discussed on the mailing list: - 4.7.3.4 - Fixed typo - Added clarification for requests with NS=1, RO=0 - 4.7.3.5 - Added topology depicting a RP, RCiEP, RCEC on the root bus - Removed constraint
|
By
Mayuresh Chitale
·
|
|
Next Platform HSC Meeting on Mon Jan 10th 2022 8AM PST
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Jan 10th 2022 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki
Hi All, The next platform HSC meeting is scheduled on Mon Jan 10th 2022 at 8AM PST. Here are the details: Agenda and minutes kept on the github wiki: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/wiki
|
By
Kumar Sankaran
·
|
|
OS-A PCIe Questions
6 messages
Hello, I’m new to participating in the platform WG. I’m working at SiFive now. I spent the last 20 years doing PCIe compliant IO fabrics for Intel chipsets. I have a few comments / questions about the
Hello, I’m new to participating in the platform WG. I’m working at SiFive now. I spent the last 20 years doing PCIe compliant IO fabrics for Intel chipsets. I have a few comments / questions about the
|
By
Michael Klinglesmith
·
|