Re: Clarification on vid.v


Joseph Rahmeh <joseph.rahmeh@...>
 

Done.  Thanks Roger.

 

From: Roger Espasa <roger.espasa@...>
Date: Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 12:49 PM
To: Joseph Rahmeh <Joseph.Rahmeh@...>
Cc: "tech-vector-ext@..." <tech-vector-ext@...>, Robert Golla <Robert.Golla@...>, Cohen Steed <Cohen.Steed@...>, Christopher Olson <Christopher.Olson@...>, Matthew Smittle <Matthew.Smittle@...>
Subject: Re: [RISC-V] [tech-vector-ext] Clarification on vid.v

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Western Digital. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the content is safe.

 

Joseph,

 

May I suggest you open a git issue here: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/issues with these two questions? It will help better tracking and will ensure whatever the resolution is, it does make it into the spec.

 

roger.

 

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 8:09 PM Joseph Rahmeh <joseph.rahmeh@...> wrote:

 

Should vid.v raise an illegal instruction exception when masked and when the destination group overlaps v0 ?

Should vid.v raise an illegal instruction exception when vstart > 0 ?

Join tech-vector-ext@lists.riscv.org to automatically receive all group messages.