Re: Minutes of 2020/3/20 vector TG meeting
Hanna Kruppe <hanna.kruppe@...>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 22:12, Bill Huffman <huffman@...> wrote:
Note that ELEN > SLEN has long been allowed in the spec (although it's expected that such implementations would be rare and unusual). But yes, if ELEN=64 then the natural constraint we independently proposed (LMUL >= SEW/ELEN in your words) would mean those combinations of LMUL and SEW are illegal. Conversely, if ELEN=128 (so that LMUL=1/4, SEW=32 would be legal legal), then we're looking at an implementation with ELEN > SLEN. Such implementations are somewhat odd and the usual intuition about SLEN's effects on the datapath doesn't apply to them even at LMUL = 1. Best, Hanna
|
|