Re: RISC-V Vector Extension post-public review updates
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:17 PM Bill Huffman <huffman@...> wrote:
I'm glad this came up. I certainly wouldn't want to try to make an implementation work for these cases. 😊
I think these encodings are qualitatively different from other nooks and crannies, since their availability is a function of the dynamic vtype setting. So we can rationalize the departure from the normal practice of marking the state reserved.
I'd personally prefer #3 due to laziness, but I don't have a technical objection to #1.