|
Re: Vector element groups
Krste,
Yes, I double checked and you are right. Padding OpenCL vectors to POT is fine.
In terms of the instructions affected by the element groups semantics, I see three cases:
- dot (this was already
Krste,
Yes, I double checked and you are right. Padding OpenCL vectors to POT is fine.
In terms of the instructions affected by the element groups semantics, I see three cases:
- dot (this was already
|
By
Abel Bernabeu
·
#825
·
|
|
RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release meeting reminder (Sep 05, 2022)
Hi all,
A reminder that an open meeting to draft the RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release is going to
be held on next Monday 2022/09/05 7AM (GMT -7) / 10PM (GMT +8). The planned agenda will
be to
Hi all,
A reminder that an open meeting to draft the RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release is going to
be held on next Monday 2022/09/05 7AM (GMT -7) / 10PM (GMT +8). The planned agenda will
be to
|
By
eop Chen
·
#824
·
|
|
Re: Vector element groups
| Krste,
| Sorry it took me a long time to provide feedback.
| Yes, this is the kind of feature we could need for graphics and GPGPU-style SIMT. Many thanks for taking the
| time to think about how
| Krste,
| Sorry it took me a long time to provide feedback.
| Yes, this is the kind of feature we could need for graphics and GPGPU-style SIMT. Many thanks for taking the
| time to think about how
|
By
Krste Asanovic
·
#823
·
|
|
Re: Vector element groups
Krste,
Sorry it took me a long time to provide feedback.
Yes, this is the kind of feature we could need for graphics and GPGPU-style SIMT. Many thanks for taking the time to think about how the idea
Krste,
Sorry it took me a long time to provide feedback.
Yes, this is the kind of feature we could need for graphics and GPGPU-style SIMT. Many thanks for taking the time to think about how the idea
|
By
Abel Bernabeu
·
#822
·
|
|
[RFC] Draft release roadmap for RVV v1.0 formal release
Hi all,
As mentioned in the first RFC letter, here we want to share our draft roadmap for the formal release.
The main goal of this release is to stablize the using environment of the RVV C
Hi all,
As mentioned in the first RFC letter, here we want to share our draft roadmap for the formal release.
The main goal of this release is to stablize the using environment of the RVV C
|
By
eop Chen
·
#821
·
|
|
[RFC] Drafting a formal v1.0 release for RVV C Intrinsic API
Hi all,
We (SiFive) are going to draft out a formal v1.0 release for the RVV C
intrinsic API. Next week we are going to provide a roadmap, including time
reserved for comments on what is left on the
Hi all,
We (SiFive) are going to draft out a formal v1.0 release for the RVV C
intrinsic API. Next week we are going to provide a roadmap, including time
reserved for comments on what is left on the
|
By
eop Chen
·
#820
·
|
|
Re: Notice of Group Archival
Krste has requested that this group not be archived due to pending work on Zvfh and Zvfhmin extensions. Based on this, we will wait until this work completes to proceed with
Krste has requested that this group not be archived due to pending work on Zvfh and Zvfhmin extensions. Based on this, we will wait until this work completes to proceed with
|
By
Jeff Scheel <jeff@...>
·
#819
·
|
|
Notice of Group Archival
Community members,
The Vector Extension Task Group community has completed its work and is slated to be deactivated and archived on August 15, 2022. If you believe that this decision has been made in
Community members,
The Vector Extension Task Group community has completed its work and is slated to be deactivated and archived on August 15, 2022. If you believe that this decision has been made in
|
By
Jeff Scheel <jeff@...>
·
#818
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
Hi Peter:
Discovery ABI/API are discussed in another place, which might not be
part of psABI, it would be more like Linux specific stuffs, SiFive
folks and Rivos folks have some discussion about the
Hi Peter:
Discovery ABI/API are discussed in another place, which might not be
part of psABI, it would be more like Linux specific stuffs, SiFive
folks and Rivos folks have some discussion about the
|
By
Kito Cheng
·
#817
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
Hi Zalman:
Define a standardized vector ABI means we can have a common interface
and agreement among different compiler and libraries, isn't means we
must use that everywhere, we did have several way
Hi Zalman:
Define a standardized vector ABI means we can have a common interface
and agreement among different compiler and libraries, isn't means we
must use that everywhere, we did have several way
|
By
Kito Cheng
·
#816
·
|
|
Re: RISCV Vector Compliance Test Suite
If you're in a hurry, Imperas has developed a set of vector tests also, and they're likely very comprehensive.
I don't know which configurations are supported though.
If you're in a hurry, Imperas has developed a set of vector tests also, and they're likely very comprehensive.
I don't know which configurations are supported though.
|
By
Allen Baum
·
#815
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
First of all, discussion of libc functions such as strcmp is irrelevant to this thread, as they do not have vector register arguments. They pass pointers to arguments in memory and use (and always
First of all, discussion of libc functions such as strcmp is irrelevant to this thread, as they do not have vector register arguments. They pass pointers to arguments in memory and use (and always
|
By
Bruce Hoult
·
#814
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
I would like to emphasize Zalman Stern's point about trading off hardware
economy for dynamic software optimization, in the context of a larger
comment about optimizing compiled code for RISC-V. The
I would like to emphasize Zalman Stern's point about trading off hardware
economy for dynamic software optimization, in the context of a larger
comment about optimizing compiled code for RISC-V. The
|
By
ghost
·
#813
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
A plea to not design the future around vague and ill-considered use cases...
A fundamental issue here is that a vector unit built for high performance computing will potentially have a massive amount
A plea to not design the future around vague and ill-considered use cases...
A fundamental issue here is that a vector unit built for high performance computing will potentially have a massive amount
|
By
Zalman Stern
·
#812
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
Hi Jan:
Thanks for your amazing work! I think that it is very useful, it saves
us time to re-implement those functions with RVV :)
Hi Jan:
Thanks for your amazing work! I think that it is very useful, it saves
us time to re-implement those functions with RVV :)
|
By
Kito Cheng
·
#811
·
|
|
Re: Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
Hi Kito,
Might this implementation of math functions be helpful? It already supports RVV via intrinsics.
Hi Kito,
Might this implementation of math functions be helpful? It already supports RVV via intrinsics.
|
By
Jan Wassenberg
·
#810
·
|
|
Seeking inputs for evaluating vector ABI design
Hi:
I am Kito from the RISC-V psABI group, we've defined a basic vector
ABI, which allows function use vector registers within function, that
could be used for optimize several libraries like libc,
Hi:
I am Kito from the RISC-V psABI group, we've defined a basic vector
ABI, which allows function use vector registers within function, that
could be used for optimize several libraries like libc,
|
By
Kito Cheng
·
#809
·
|
|
Re: RISCV Vector Compliance Test Suite
FYI: https://github.com/riscv-software-src/riscv-tests/pull/400
<alexander.podoplelov@...> wrote:
FYI: https://github.com/riscv-software-src/riscv-tests/pull/400
<alexander.podoplelov@...> wrote:
|
By
Kito Cheng
·
#808
·
|
|
Re: RISCV Vector Compliance Test Suite
Also, could you please inform me about RISC-V Vector compliance tests v1.0?
25.07.2022 13:52, Umer Shahid пишет:
Also, could you please inform me about RISC-V Vector compliance tests v1.0?
25.07.2022 13:52, Umer Shahid пишет:
|
By
Alexander Podoplelov
·
#807
·
|
|
Re: RISCV Vector Compliance Test Suite
Great, thanks for letting me know.
Regards,
Umer
--
Umer Shahid
Member Technical Staff
10xEngineers
Mobile: +92-334-4072836
Email: umer.shahid@..., umershahid@...,pk
Great, thanks for letting me know.
Regards,
Umer
--
Umer Shahid
Member Technical Staff
10xEngineers
Mobile: +92-334-4072836
Email: umer.shahid@..., umershahid@...,pk
|
By
Umer Shahid
·
#806
·
|