Date
1 - 3 of 3
[riscv/riscv-v-spec] the differing nature of LMUL > 1 and fractional LMUL (#382)
|
David Horner
Thank you very much for this.
I started a pull request, but was including as an extension
and still debating the best way to incorporate.
Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a
substantial revision?
I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance. From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well. The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08. Thank you very much. On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04
Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote:
|
|
|
| Thank you very much for this.On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:16:22 -0400, DSHORNER <ds2horner@...> said: | I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate. | Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision? | I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance. | From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well. | The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08. There are a bunch more pending changes, to get to a 0.9 candidate, and I' d rather wait till those are in to generate pdf. Planning to do this over weekend. Krste | Thank you very much. | On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote: | Closed #382 via 9c7732b. | — | You are receiving this because you authored the thread. | Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. |
|
|
|
David Horner
OK. Again thanks. I will generate a few versions and compare incrementally. Will report the anomalies if they show up in your weekend efforts. On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 19:42 , <krste@...> wrote:
|
|
|