[riscv/riscv-v-spec] the differing nature of LMUL > 1 and fractional LMUL (#382)


David Horner
 

OK. Again thanks.

I will generate a few versions and compare incrementally.

Will report the anomalies if they show up in your weekend efforts.


On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 19:42 , <krste@...> wrote:


>>>>> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:16:22 -0400, DSHORNER <ds2horner@...> said:

| Thank you very much for this.
| I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate.

| Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision?
| I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance.
| From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well.

| The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08.

There are a bunch more pending changes, to get to a 0.9 candidate, and
I' d rather wait till those are in to generate pdf.  Planning to do
this over weekend.

Krste

| Thank you very much.

| On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote:

|     Closed #382 via 9c7732b.

|     —
|     You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|     Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.


Krste Asanovic
 

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:16:22 -0400, DSHORNER <ds2horner@...> said:
| Thank you very much for this.
| I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate.

| Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision?
| I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance.
| From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well.

| The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08.

There are a bunch more pending changes, to get to a 0.9 candidate, and
I' d rather wait till those are in to generate pdf. Planning to do
this over weekend.

Krste

| Thank you very much.

| On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote:

| Closed #382 via 9c7732b.

| —
| You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
| Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.


David Horner
 

Thank you very much for this.
I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate.

Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision?
I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance.
From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well.

The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08.

Thank you very much.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote:

Closed #382 via 9c7732b.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.