Topics

[riscv/riscv-v-spec] the differing nature of LMUL > 1 and fractional LMUL (#382)


David Horner
 

Thank you very much for this.
I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate.

Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision?
I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance.
From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well.

The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08.

Thank you very much.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote:

Closed #382 via 9c7732b.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.


Krste Asanovic
 

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:16:22 -0400, DSHORNER <ds2horner@gmail.com> said:
| Thank you very much for this.
| I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate.

| Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision?
| I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance.
| From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well.

| The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08.

There are a bunch more pending changes, to get to a 0.9 candidate, and
I' d rather wait till those are in to generate pdf. Planning to do
this over weekend.

Krste

| Thank you very much.

| On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@github.com> wrote:

| Closed #382 via 9c7732b.

| —
| You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
| Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.


David Horner
 

OK. Again thanks.

I will generate a few versions and compare incrementally.

Will report the anomalies if they show up in your weekend efforts.


On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 19:42 , <krste@...> wrote:


>>>>> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:16:22 -0400, DSHORNER <ds2horner@...> said:

| Thank you very much for this.
| I started a pull request, but was including as an extension and still debating the best way to incorporate.

| Would it be possible to generate a pdf for what is now a substantial revision?
| I realize it is not yet a point release but adding fractional, removing byte/half/word plus the smaller revisions generates a different appearance.
| From a reference POV sections and subsections line up reasonable well.

| The pdf I generate has some formatting anomalies that I cannot easily reconcile with the existing v 0.08.

There are a bunch more pending changes, to get to a 0.9 candidate, and
I' d rather wait till those are in to generate pdf.  Planning to do
this over weekend.

Krste

| Thank you very much.

| On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 04:04 Krste Asanovic, <notifications@...> wrote:

|     Closed #382 via 9c7732b.

|     —
|     You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|     Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.